IRU and RUN Collaborate for a Fairer System

Two of Australia’s key university consortia—the Innovative Research Universities (IRU) and the Regional Universities Network (RUN)—have released a joint five-point plan aimed at overhauling the country’s international education system. Together, they represent 14 institutions nationwide, and their unified message stresses the need for equity, sustainability, and inclusivity in managing international student engagement.

In a statement, both bodies urged the Australian government to adopt a “positive and principles-based” approach to policymaking that supports all communities and institutions, not just those in major cities.

Concerns Over Ministerial Direction 107

IRU Executive Director Paul Harris voiced concerns about Ministerial Direction 107 (MD 107) introduced in 2024, which has reportedly caused disproportionate enrolment declines at smaller and regional universities. He called for a revised policy aligned with the Universities Accord, focusing on equity, inclusion, and wider participation.

RUN CEO Alec Webb echoed the need for collaborative policymaking, stressing that any reforms must reflect global education trends and benefit the entire Australian sector, not just metropolitan centers.

The Five-Point Strategy Explained

1. Managed, Equitable Growth

IRU and RUN are advocating for better distribution of international student numbers to prevent overconcentration in large cities. They highlighted a 28–30% enrolment drop in their member universities due to MD 107, compared to gains in major city-based institutions. They want mission-based agreements via the Australian Tertiary Education Commission to manage future student allocations, with immediate clarity on 2026 numbers.

2. Reduced Visa Costs

Both networks criticised the recent increase in student visa application fees to AUD$2,000, now making Australia the most expensive international education destination. They propose fee reductions for short-term courses under 12 months, in line with concessions already offered to Pacific Island students.

3. Strengthened Integrity and Quality Control

To address issues like course-hopping, IRU and RUN support stricter regulations. Their suggestions include extending the transfer restriction period from 6 to 12 months and possibly requiring new visa applications for provider changes. They emphasised the need for sector-wide consultation to ensure reforms are effective and fair.

4. Greater Data Transparency

They called for real-time, publicly accessible data on student numbers and visa processing to support better institutional planning and public trust. Additionally, they urged the Department of Home Affairs to improve communication around visa processing times and eligibility criteria for prospective students.

5. A Long-Term Strategic Vision

The networks urged the Albanese government to finalise a national international education strategy. This should include:

• Equitable student distribution

• Tailored visa policies

• Increased outbound mobility for Australian students (especially postgraduates and those from disadvantaged groups)

• Restoration of funding to Endeavour and Destination Australia programs

• Expanded transnational education (TNE) with clear definitions and exemptions for offshore learners

A Call to Work with the New Minister

The joint plan comes in the wake of Julian Hill’s appointment as Minister for International Education. Both IRU and RUN expressed a strong willingness to work closely with the new minister to develop a forward-looking, inclusive international education landscape for Australia.

For any further curries feel free to contact us.

FAQs

Q: What is the main objective of the IRU and RUN’s five-point plan?
A: To create a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable international education system across all Australian universities.

Q: What concerns were raised about Ministerial Direction 107 (MD 107)?
A: MD 107 led to a sharp decline in enrolments at smaller and regional institutions, while benefiting large city universities.

Q: Why are student visa fees a concern?
A: Recent increases to AUD$2,000 make Australia the most expensive study destination, deterring diversity and access.

Q: What changes are proposed to manage student distribution?
A: The plan calls for mission-based agreements through the Australian Tertiary Education Commission to prevent overconcentration in big cities.

Q: How do the networks suggest improving quality and integrity?
A: By extending the transfer restriction period and possibly requiring new visas for students switching education providers.

Q: What is being asked regarding data transparency?
A: Public access to real-time data on student numbers and visa timelines to support decision-making and build trust.

Q: How will the long-term strategy benefit students?
A: It aims to ensure fair visa policies, expanded mobility for Australian students, and restored funding for international collaboration programs.