Yvette Cooper Says Many Unaware of True Nature of Palestine Action Amid Mass Arrests

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has stated that some supporters of Palestine Action may not fully understand the group’s true nature, in the wake of a mass arrest involving over 500 individuals last weekend. Her comments came as she defended the UK government’s recent decision to ban the organisation under terrorism legislation, insisting the group is not non-violent, contrary to what some may believe.

Speaking on the issue, Cooper said that while many people have taken to the streets to express concern over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the majority have done so peacefully and legally, without any connection to Palestine Action. She noted that tens of thousands of demonstrators had voiced their opposition to the ongoing violence in Gaza through lawful means, and that this should be distinguished from the activities associated with the banned group.

“Many people are rightly angry and horrified by what is happening in Gaza,” Cooper said. “They have exercised their democratic right to protest peacefully. But that is different from the tactics used by Palestine Action, which has shown a pattern of behaviour that goes beyond peaceful protest.”

Palestine Action was officially proscribed as a terrorist organisation in July, a move that has sparked a mixture of political and legal reactions. The group is known for its direct-action tactics targeting UK-based companies linked to the arms trade, particularly those connected to Israel. The government justified its decision by citing the group’s involvement in repeated unlawful and disruptive activities, including property damage and forced entry into facilities.

The proscription means that it is now a criminal offence to belong to, support, or promote Palestine Action. Since the ban, police have carried out several coordinated actions against activists affiliated with the group. This past weekend saw more than 500 individuals arrested during a large-scale demonstration, triggering backlash from human rights organisations and civil liberties advocates.

Among those responding to the arrests was Amnesty International, which expressed serious concern about the scale and nature of the police action. The organisation described the arrests as “deeply concerning” and urged authorities to ensure that the right to peaceful protest is protected, even in cases where public order concerns exist.

Despite the ban, Palestine Action has gained court approval to challenge the government’s decision. A judicial review is scheduled for November, where the legality and justification of the proscription will be examined. Lawyers representing the group argue that the ban represents a politically motivated attempt to silence dissent and criminalise protest against the arms trade and UK foreign policy.

Palestine Action, for its part, maintains that its actions are non-violent, despite their confrontational tactics. The group claims its methods are necessary to expose and disrupt what they call “complicity” in the ongoing conflict in Gaza, and has accused the UK government of targeting them due to their effectiveness in drawing attention to arms companies and their ties to Israel.

In response, Cooper has reiterated the importance of distinguishing between legitimate protest and what she described as extremist tactics. She emphasized that the government continues to support the right to lawful assembly and protest, but drew a clear line at what she views as criminal activity disguised as activism.

“The right to protest is a cornerstone of our democracy,” she said, “but we cannot allow that to be exploited by groups whose methods involve intimidation, violence, or the deliberate destruction of property.”

As the legal challenge against the government’s decision moves forward, the debate around Palestine Action’s activities, the scope of protest rights, and the definition of extremism is likely to intensify. With the hearing set for November, both supporters and critics of the ban are preparing for a significant legal and political battle that could have wider implications for the future of protest in the UK

For further querries contact us